<aside> 💡 This is work in progress
</aside>
Outcomes of this discussion to be added to
https://github.com/openfoodfoundation/product-pipe/issues/4
Agreed in Product Curation Nov 30th we need to work on a process how to prioritize things in the "Needs Inception" Column to move to "Ready for Inception".
This process is partly about was formerly done by voting, but now that this list is not only fed in by wishlist (issues / problems in there do also come from other sources) we need to rework the prioritization process.
How to define the scope of which kind of things need wider community approval (voting), what are things that we can prioritize within the "product curation circle"
Example: History of Invoice Changes (https://github.com/openfoodfoundation/inception-pipe/issues/11) needs community approval to be moved into the pipe, whereas Mobile UX - Usertesting (https://github.com/openfoodfoundation/inception-pipe/issues/7) can just be decided to be a priority within the product circle / product curation meeting.
Criteria:
Is there a new process that works better than "voting" for the wishlist items to enter the inception pipe? Or can we simply come up with a better voting process?
How does the product vision & strategy work tie into / can be aligned with this prioritization?
Additional Questions, that could be discussed in that context:
Who can create issues in the Inception Pipe?
Could this replace the wishlist?
Ideas:
->Grooming of this column in Product Curation Meeting (possibly better every 2nd?) to prioritize or park items.
->If Issues added by community, promote use of problem statement template and put Label “Product Check”